Posts

c. myers live – Maximizing Net Worth: Insights for Financial Institutions

, ,

The financial services industry is changing day by day, and the impact of net worth on organizational performance and growth is relevant and top-of-mind for many institutions.  In this c. myers live, we explore the importance of strategic net worth considerations.  We also provide insights on how organizations can maintain optimal net worth levels through strategic planning and decision-making, while aggregating risks and always considering different opportunities.

For access to the interactive tools Rob and Charlene discussed in the podcast, please click here.  These tools are designed to help organize thoughts in order to have productive conversations around strategic net worth and other important topics.

About the Hosts:

Rob Johnson

Rob, one of five c. myers owners, has a reputation for deep, original thinking on asset/liability management and every conceivable modeling methodology, as well as analysis of investments, liquidity, aggregate risk, concentration risk, and other related topics. While Rob is a familiar face to the managements and boards of many of the largest organizations, he has helped financial institutions of all sizes tackle some of their toughest challenges, such as rebuilding capital and navigating safely and soundly with the smallest of margins. He has become quite familiar to many leaders in the regulatory world, both as an educator and a thought leader.

Learn more about Rob

Charlene Leland

Charlene LelandSince joining c. myers in 2004, Charlene has become one of the most diverse facilitators within the industry, especially with regard to helping financial institutions of all sizes address three necessary business objectives: relevancy, differentiation, and sustainability. Over the years, she has honed her skills for facilitating various types of sessions, including Strategic Planning, Strategic Implementation, Member Journey and Experience Improvement, and Strategic Financial Planning.

Learn more about Charlene

Other ways to listen to c. myers live:

listen on google podcasts listen on spotify listen on apple podcasts

4 Tips for a Growth Mindset

,

4 minute read – Imagine you have begun climbing Mount Everest, you reach 24,000 feet and realize you didn’t bring enough oxygen.  Without oxygen, it is nearly impossible to complete the climb.  Do you take it as a failure?  Or do you acknowledge your disappointment and take it as an opportunity to reflect and assess how you can come better prepared next time?  Growing in your personal life and career might not be quite as dangerous as climbing Mount Everest, but we can only achieve our goals when we have the necessary tools.  So, what stops us from being the most successful version of ourselves?  Many of us haven’t taken the time for the introspection required in the process of continual optimization of self to even know what we need. 

Here are 4 steps to help you cultivate your toolbox for achievement: 

  • Have some honest conversations with yourself.  Dig into the root of your situation.  It can be uncomfortable to hold ourselves accountable in moments of disappointment or frustration.  Placing blame externally or identifying surface level fixes might be easier but ultimately leave you worse off because deeper needs are at play.  Make a habit of performing self-assessment:  What are your strengths?  How are you utilizing those strengths in your role?  What are the gaps between your strengths and the demands of your role?  Setting goals around self-accountability or developing a routine check-in process with yourself can help you focus your energies more effectively.  
  • Pinpoint your motivations and articulate your goals.  What are your absolutes and where can you be flexible or compromise in achieving your end goals?  How do you want to show up in your brand?  Clarifying goals and your metrics of success creates opportunity to hold yourself accountable.  Similar to having those sometimes difficult conversations with yourself, this needs to be a continual process, regularly revisiting and adjusting your goals and measures of success as you grow. 
  • Be present and be direct.  A key element to climbing Mount Everest is being ready for the unexpected, and while you might not face a snowstorm inside the office, being open to uncertainty can keep you better prepared to be flexible in situations.  Practice being present.  As humans, we are often thinking about our response to others or the next task on our to-do list rather than being present in the moment, leaving us unable to adapt in moments of the unexpected.  Additionally, practice being direct.  Cutting out filler words, extraneous information, and over explanation when making requests of others can promote more succinct, clearer communication, making sure you get what you need in an effective, timely manner.  
  • Fuel your tank.  Whether it is a quick walk outside between meetings or a week-long vacation to the Maldives, making time to step away from your duties can give you renewed clarity, increased concentration, and revived energy, leaving you feeling ready for the next leg of your climb.  Like the climb itself, creating opportunities for refueling may require some planning – delegating tasks and knowing when to negotiate requests outside your capacity can help you find balance.  In the fast-paced, connected world we live in, it can be tempting to push yourself to physical and mental limits, but growth requires respite from the grind.  

Many of us have gotten to this point in our careers because we get things done, grinding through situations and potentially wearing ourselves out; some of us even fall into that dangerous mentality of “I’ll just do it myself” rather than pause, reflect, and ask for help.   Pushing through can only get you so far; even the most experienced climbers can only get so far without oxygen – 26,000 feet to be exact.  Eventually, we must be willing to let our guard down and ask for our needs to be met, embracing each small step in the longer effort toward becoming our best selves. 

c. myers live – Liquidity Considerations on the Heels of SVB

, , , ,

As the financial industry is discussing the ramifications of the recent closings of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, many are asking themselves, “Where do we go from here?”  This is an opportunity to take a step back and evaluate your institution’s next steps in this rapidly changing environment.  In this c. myers live, we address your questions and concerns about short-term and long-term liquidity management and analysis, the value of understanding the impact of your uninsured deposits, and the importance of maintaining trust and communication with your customers throughout this wild ride.  

We have written many blogs recently that touch on a number of issues covered in this podcast and amongst financial institutions every single day. 

Contact us about our Liquidity Analysis, we are here to help you think and discuss customized options for your institution.  

About the Hosts:

Brian McHenry

brian mchenry headshotBrian, one of five c. myers owners, has worked closely with financial institution Boards and managements of all sizes in a variety of capacities. As a strategic planning facilitator, CEOs regularly praise Brian’s industry knowledge, calming communication skills, ability to authentically engage anyone with whom he interacts, and ability to keep discussions focused on linking strategy with desired measures of success.

Learn more about Brian

Sally Myers

sally myers headshotSally is a founder of c. myers corporation and one of five owners. Driven by a deep commitment to helping financial industry leaders and regulators for more than two decades, her guidance has shaped c. myers’ focus on helping clients create opportunities and approach problem solving from a scalable perspective. She has also been a strategic force behind the development of c. myers’ financial models.

Learn more about Sally

Rob Johnson

Rob, President and one of five c. myers owners, has been instrumental in delivering on the vision of enabling leadership teams to have relevant and reliable financial decision-information at their fingertips, so that they can accelerate their strategic impact in providing value to their markets.  Clients find the speed of the decision-information, whether at the enterprise level or drilling into what is driving profitability at a category level, combined with Rob’s quick mind and critical thinking, to be invaluable.

Learn more about Rob

Other ways to listen to c. myers live:

listen on google podcasts listen on spotify listen on apple podcasts

5 Practical Ways to Engage Employees

,

4 minute read The following blog post was written by c. myers and originally published by CUES on December 21, 2022.

As leaders, we know that engaged employees are good for morale, which is good for business.  It is also personally rewarding to help grow talent and deepen their connections and contributions to a higher purpose.   

Most people like to feel a sense of accomplishment, so they strive to be productive every day.  At the end of the day, they like to look back and say “I got these things done today” or “I made great strides…”  Part of a leader’s role is to guide in getting the right things or best things done, most of the time.   

In light of this, many leaders prioritize consistently communicating the organization’s strategy to all team members.  The hope is that it will result in employees who spend their time working on the right things and who connect what they’re doing with greater organizational objectives.  However, leaders are often unhappy with the outcome because top-down communication is only one component of what needs to be done.   

Following are 5 practical ways to enhance employee strategic understanding, connection, and engagement.   

1. Reverse the communication.  Have employees all across the organization tell their story of how what they “got done today” helped move the organization toward achieving its higher purpose.  It is so enlightening to see how employees are connecting what they do with the organization’s strategy.  You may be surprised in how they are making the connection and if their story is not on the right path, it is a great opportunity to have a gentle course correction.  Either way, you will have a better understanding of gaps.    

2. Focus on the middle of your organization because things get lost in translation.  Often, senior leaders grasp the bigger picture, and it is easier for them to make the appropriate decisions as to how they are spending their time relative to the impact the organization needs.  Unfortunately, many senior leaders assume the mid-level leadership and managers will also have a strategic mindset as they decide how to spend their time.  Remember, mid-level leaders are often deep in tactics so it can be hard for them to rewire their thinking, and view tactics from a strategic perspective.  Also, in many organizations, the mid-level leadership has more direct contact with most employees.  If you bring them along it can be a huge boost for the entire organization. 

3. Practice using strategy as a filter when discussing the big stuff.  As departments are having their meetings, ask them to practice using the strategy as a filter for prioritization of resources and projects.  When they are making recommendations ask them to link their recommendations to strategy.  Practice on the big stuff first.  Once they become more comfortable with this process on high-impact decisions, it is easier to make it a habit of thinking from this perspective on the little stuff.  

4. Cultivate emerging talent.  Identify those who show interest or capability and include them in bigger picture strategic discussions rather than limiting those discussions to existing leaders.  In addition to asking them for their thoughts during those discussions, ask for their recommendations and their rationale.  Some great question are: 

  • If you had to make the decision today, what would you decide, and why?   
  • What other information would you need or want to make a decision? 
  • If we don’t do X now, what could be the implications 1 year from now, 3 years from now, etc.?  
  • If we decided to do X, what might we have to forego and why? 

5. Don’t give up.  It takes focus, effort, and patience to incorporate this type of thinking organization-wide.  Remember, every 1% improvement matters.  Also, most people want to learn and relate to a higher purpose.   Get their ideas of what drives their engagement and connection, and take some risks to let them test some of their ideas.  

Taking steps to instill strategic understanding and thinking deeper into the organization is worth the additional thought and effort.  When your strategy becomes the guiding light for all employees, not just board members and executives, more of the impactful things will get done and more of your people will be inspired to be a part of it. 

Static and Dynamic Methodologies – Critical ALM Modeling Issues That Can’t Be Ignored

, , ,

7 minute read – As rates have increased materially, and liquidity pressure continues to build, leaders will continue to be faced with high-impact decisions that can have longer term consequences.  Reliable and timely financial decision-information is a huge component of a successful decision-making process.

This blog on Static Balance Sheet Analysis (sometimes referred to as Static NII or Net Interest Income) and Dynamic Simulations is part of a series addressing critical ALM modeling issues.

Static Balance Sheet Analysis, by definition, assumes that the balance sheet structure never changes, even if rates change.  The static methodology was developed prior to advanced computing power.  Unfortunately, it has remained pervasive in modern risk analysis.  This simplified methodology is particularly dangerous and misleading in the rate environments decision-makers are facing today, as it can understate risk.  For example, many institutions’ ability to attract funding is shrinking and the mix of funding is changing to higher cost sources.  This is completely ignored in a Static Balance Sheet simulation.

Problem:  Static reflects none of the potential liquidity pressure that has historically occurred when rates rise, ignoring the resulting change in funding mix and its impact on the cost of funds.

Solution 1:  First and foremost, make sure the limitations of the Static Balance Sheet Analysis are clear to other decision-makers to avoid unpleasant surprises.    

  • Caution – It is common for people to think that their ALM model has decay/withdrawal assumptions, so they think the risk is covered. A confusing reality in most models is that those assumptions ONLY apply to their EVE/NEV answers, but NOT their risks to earnings and capital.
  • Caution – We have heard some people say that they also do a Dynamic Simulation, so they are covered.  A Dynamic Simulation can address some of the risk if it assumes a shift from lower cost deposits to higher cost deposits like certificates.  The problem is most Dynamic Simulations don’t factor in that the shift should get worse as rates go higher.

Solution 2:  Incorporate a methodology that automatically changes the mix of deposits as rates change.

Problem:  There are no fixes to the Static Balance Sheet methodology that also preserve the true definition of static.  However, there are some work-arounds if your modeling capabilities or policies are limited to Static Balance Sheet Analysis.

Solution:  Create a non-maturity deposit category to represent the non-maturity deposits that could shift to CDs as rate advantages develop.  Move some of the starting funds into that account and have it reprice to your new CD rates.  (Keep in mind your average balance per account pressure along with the consumer’s advantage to move to CDs)

  • This doesn’t address the reality that the amount that may move should be expected to change as rates change. Typically, as rates go higher, the difference in pricing between products increases, meaning that the consumer has more of an advantage to move their funds to higher-priced products.  For example, more migration is likely to happen if rates increase 300 basis points than if they increase 100 basis points.
  • Consider moving the maximum you think will migrate in the highest rate environment to capture additional risk exposure.
  • The representation of migrating funds could be included either in your base simulation or as a what-if.  We encourage decision-makers to include it in the base simulation if you think it is more realistic that some funds will move to higher-cost products as market rates rise.  A starting point for the amount to move could be based on your assumed decay rates.
  • Caution – It can seem simpler to move the balance into a current CD account and assume that the term is a year or more, but this fails to capture the volatility that should result from funds migrating from lower rates to higher rates during the simulation, hiding risks from decision-makers.

There are also problems with Dynamic Simulations, many of which are solvable.  Here are just a few considerations.

Problem:  Similar to the issue with Static Balance Sheet Analysis, many Dynamic Simulation models do not incorporate decay rates when quantifying risks to earnings and capital.

Keeping the same future balance, regardless of market rates, doesn’t appropriately address the exposure and can understate the volatility.  It misses the risk that the funding mix can change and the resulting impact to the cost of funds.

Ask Yourself:  As discussed in previous blogs, why is it standard practice to apply decay assumptions when doing EVE/NEV and yet this practice is ignored in typical Static and Dynamic Balance Sheet Analysis?

Solution:  You will need to make manual adjustments to represent the potential reductions in balances on the lower-priced products and the shift to higher-priced products, if appropriate.  While it is not difficult to make this assumption for one environment, most models do not have the ability for the non-maturity balance to automatically change for each rate environment simulated.

Problem:  Assumptions regarding new business can hide risks that currently exist or introduce risks that don’t exist.  This muddies the waters for decision-makers and can lead to overconfidence in the risk position or unnecessary de-risking.

Solution:  Run simulations that isolate existing risk/return, focusing on the potential profit and capital impact in the current structure.  A benefit of this is to see the potential timing of risk and what it may take to offset the risk if exposure is too high.  This will help decision-makers have more clarity as to the sources of risks and returns before deciding the best course of action.

Problem:  Focusing on the relative rate environment and consistency in assumptions is overrated.   The rate environment has changed drastically in recent months and assumptions assigned to current and up/down rate environments deserve a thorough review.  These types of assumptions can heavily influence the results of risks to earnings, capital, and EVE/NEV.

Solution:  Dig deep into your decay rate assumptions to ensure that the actual current rate environment, which changes over time, is being considered.  This is a hard, yet critically needed, shift in ALM modeling mindset.  This is only one of many examples regarding assumptions that need to be reviewed.  This is addressed in detail in our blog on decay rates.

As we said in the beginning, reliable financial decision-information is critical to thriving in this type of environment.

We run thousands of risks to earnings, capital, and EVE/NEV simulations and what-ifs each year, so we understand the considerations facing finance teams today – this blog just scratches the surface.  We know that timing is critical and finance teams need to move fast.  Please feel free to call us if you have questions on the information provided in this blog.

You may also be interested in: